JetLevel / Results
Results with context. Decisions informed by data.
The figures below are already part of JetLevel’s public presentation and refer to accounts managed between January and June 2026. They are aggregate results or campaign highlights, not complete case studies or forecasts for a new project.
People reached across the published aggregate results.
Tracked client revenue, according to the published aggregate figures.
Highest published ROAS; this is not the average return across all campaigns.
Highlights by context
Restaurants
Published results include 1.07 million impressions with 6,366% growth, and a highlight of 4.59 million impressions in six months. These are visibility indicators; they do not, by themselves, demonstrate sales or profit.
Adventure sector
A cost of €1.65 per lead and a ROAS of 7.2× were published. Lead cost and advertising return measure different things. Assessing profitability also requires lead quality, margin and other costs.
Tourism
The website reports 754% growth in impressions in a quarter. Interpreting this for a specific project requires the baseline, channels and campaign objective.
What a case study should explain
A useful case study identifies the initial challenge, reporting period, work delivered and measurement method. It separates reach, enquiries, attributed revenue and profitability. Here we retain the level of detail already published, without assigning figures to clients not identified in the source.
What about AI projects?
The AI examples on this website are illustrative scenarios, not measured client outcomes. We can discuss a process similar to yours and define how to evaluate it: time per task, errors, completed requests or service quality.
Contact us to discuss what these indicators mean for your business. The aim is to choose suitable metrics for your project, not promise a repeat of a result from a different context.